Joining a loyalty program costs a customer almost nothing. Paying attention to one costs a lot more. That gap explains most of what is going wrong in the UAE market right now.
Walk through any mall in Dubai and you'll find people carrying a bank card, a supermarket card, an airline membership and a telecom app, all with their own points balance. Globally, the average consumer belongs to about 17.4 active loyalty programs, according to the Bond Loyalty Report. The UAE sits near the crowded end of that range.
The market in numbers
Money is still flowing in. ResearchAndMarkets projects the UAE loyalty market to grow from about US$490.8 million in 2025 to US$817.6 million in 2029, which works out to 13.6% a year. For the region as a whole, the same firm puts the Middle East market at US$3.27 billion in 2025.
Growth like that attracts copycats. Compare what five UAE banks offer and the pattern is hard to miss: points, a cashback tier, a travel partner, a dining discount. Each piece is reasonable on its own. Together they make programs hard to tell apart, and a program that customers can't tell apart gets treated as a commodity.
If you want the wider picture on UAE loyalty programs, including how enterprise buyers approach them, Thriwe has a longer guide. What follows focuses on where programs go wrong and what tends to fix it.
Where programs lose people
Most programs put their effort into the sign-up moment and then go quiet. Launch budgets pay for the campaign, the landing page and the welcome offer. The months that follow get a monthly email at best. In a market where switching banks takes a weekend and offers are easy to compare, that silence is expensive. Customers rarely drift away slowly. They leave the week a competitor's offer looks better.
Tier structures cause a different problem. Silver, Gold and Platinum work for airlines because flying habits vary enormously between passengers. Bond's research connects tiering with higher lifetime value, but the effect depends on that variation. Put the same ladder on a personal loan or a motor insurance policy, where nearly everyone uses the product the same way, and the tiers add rules without adding reasons to engage.
Benefits people actually use
The strongest programs in the region have moved away from points that pile up for a later redemption. They lean toward things a customer can use immediately. Mastercard and Amazon.ae announced a partnership in 2020 offering eligible cardholders a complimentary Prime membership. RAKBANK and HSBC have both offered complimentary Careem Plus subscriptions on eligible cards. The common thread is a benefit that shows up in someone's week, not their year-end statement.
The infrastructure supports this. Mordor Intelligence values the UAE payments market at roughly US$202.6 billion in 2025, with about 72% digital wallet penetration among banked customers. Customers already expect to redeem inside an app.
The categories that keep customers engaged are travel perks such as lounge access and airport transfers, dining and lifestyle experiences, digital subscriptions, everyday mobility credit, and concierge access for higher-value segments. Nobody needs to offer everything. A tight selection that looks chosen for the customer does more than a long catalogue that asks them to hunt.
Personalisation makes the difference
McKinsey found that faster-growing companies earn about 40% more of their revenue from personalisation than slower-growing ones. In loyalty terms, a static catalogue shows every customer the same menu regardless of what they do. A personalised program puts the relevant benefit in front of the right person at the right time.
Willingness to pay tells the same story. Deloitte's research, reported by Retail TouchPoints, shows 53% of consumers now pay to be part of a loyalty program, compared with 32% in 2022 and 17% in 2021. When people will pay for value, a program with nothing distinctive has a harder job convincing them to stay.
What enterprise buyers ask before they sign
Decision-makers at UAE financial institutions look past the customer app. They want to know how the program hits the P&L, how quickly it can go live and who is on the hook when redemption fails.
Cost structure sits near the top of that list. A fixed commitment sized for the best-case forecast can look reckless to a finance team a year later. An earn-and-burn model, where cost follows what customers actually redeem, is easier to approve and easier to defend.
Regulation comes next. Licensed institutions in the UAE work under the Central Bank's Consumer Protection Regulation (2020) and the Consumer Protection Standards (2021). These call for clear disclosure and fair treatment, and they cover rewards communications sent by or for a licensed institution. Programs that run across several GCC countries also need a structure that doesn't require fresh negotiations in every market. This is general background and not legal advice, so any specific program should go through legal review.
Build it yourself or bring in a partner
Building in-house looks cheaper when you total the first-year budget. The bill arrives later: a live benefits network to maintain, redemption tracking to engineer, and features to rebuild that already exist on the market. A loyalty infrastructure partner costs you some control, but you get faster launch, a single view of redemption data and one compliance relationship instead of many vendor contracts.
Try this before your next budget review
Ask whether a customer who belongs to five other programs would notice yours. If the answer is no, a bigger reward probably won't change it. A smaller, better-delivered one might.
Then pull last quarter's redemption data and see what customers actually used. Whatever nobody touched is the first thing to cut.
Comments
Post a Comment